i'm all about them, words.
Friday, May 12, 2006
- 11:30 PM
conflict resolution
ok. i dun wanna let this conflict go on. so here's the resolution.
dun cause me or my friends trouble again, and i wont cause you any trouble.
by the way, u gotta thank the person u called an "uncivil man"and who has done the "worst thing" for making me give this conflict a resolution. (quotes from vince)
wow. the person whom u called uncivil and doing the worst stuff is helping u. paradox here. i tink it's a message telling me that ending the conflict is uncivil and that it's the worst thing to do. but oh well, since i'm the "bitch", one of the "childish people", "perverse" and "ungentleman"ly, i guess it's only my fault that im ending this conflict.
altho i haf to admit that i detest the way u talk abt ronald as a dog. dat's like sooooo the right thing to do huh. well, i guess i cant comment on that, i mean, im not mr perfect, but im sure someone else is.
aniwaes, im just thinking.... i was wondering why daryl called debbie a "whore". i mean, im sure he wouldnt do it for no reason... but then again, u claim that daryl is "uncivil", so... i wouldnt noe. maybe he is the uncivil one, maybe someone else is.
and then im wondering, whether WX told jasmine abt a prank he played on u first, or did u tell her that WX rapes girls first. just another thought. no need for answering, unless u want to.
also, im having this thought... why are u imitating ronald's animal references. he calls u a lamb and u call him a dog. is this animal kingdom coming to life? and then u're beginning to try to quote like ronald too. wow. copycat? or are the gay tendencies finally resurfacing (as said by ronald). lol. just wondering.
finally, im kinda pondering over why ur blog is named such. "The Book In The Iceberg", and then the URL is "http://frozen-hearted.blogspot.com/". frozen hearted. hmmm. does it reflect anythn abt u? i dun wanna answer that, u dun haf to either. ;)
alrite then. i'll keep it to just thoughts, so i wont bother answering those thoughts. and so there can be no conflict... rite? i mean, afterall, it's not wrong to think... is it? (=